davinci resolve 17 free vs paid comparison

#Davinci resolve 17 free vs paid comparison pro
#Davinci resolve 17 free vs paid comparison software
#Davinci resolve 17 free vs paid comparison professional
#Davinci resolve 17 free vs paid comparison series

Video editing apps that work great for one person might not work as well for another.

#Davinci resolve 17 free vs paid comparison software

The use case for each software really depends on the user. In DaVinci Resolve, this export landed at 27 seconds. Keeping all else the same, exporting this timeline using a ProRes 422 codec yielded a 20-second export time in Final Cut. The same footage and timeline brought into DaVinci Resolve had an export time of 1 minute.

The codec used during this export was a high-quality H.264 codec.

#Davinci resolve 17 free vs paid comparison pro

The timelines for each of the tests were set as 4k as well.įor the first test, the H.264 footage on Final Cut Pro was exported in 1 minute and 9 seconds (for a 3-minute and 50-second timeline). All exports included transitions as well as color. The first test used 4k H.264 footage, the second used 4k ProRes 422 footage, and the third used 5k RED Raw footage.

#Davinci resolve 17 free vs paid comparison series

To demonstrate the slight performance differences, I ran a series of three tests on an M1 Max Macbook Pro (with 64 GB of Ram). DaVinci Resolve 17 and up were recently updated to work with Apple Silicon devices (the M1 and M2 chips), so users with Macs using these chips can expect great performance. Media playback is great in DaVinci Resolve as well though, with Blackmagic doing a really stellar job at optimizing Resolve across all operating systems. The M1 and M2 devices offer nearly real-time, high-quality video playback. The Intel-based Mac devices ran Final Cut great as well, but performance is noticeably shaky compared to the M1 and M2 counterparts. Things such as media playback are incredibly smooth in Final Cut Pro, especially on the new M1 and M2 series of chips that Apple started rolling out for their devices back in 2020. There are only a handful of devices Final Cut runs on, meaning Apple is able to really optimize Final Cut for those particular devices. The better your GPU, the better DaVinci is going to run. A thing to note is that DaVinci Resolve is incredibly GPU intensive. Performance in both Final Cut Pro and DaVinci Resolve is really quite excellent. DaVinci Resolve has a clear emphasis on color grading and color correction as well, with more complex color grading tools than any other NLE on the market.ĭaVinci Resolve vs. Final Cut Pro offers a “user-friendly” sort of experience, offering an incredibly intuitive and clean-looking workspace.ĭaVinci Resolve is a lot more advanced in its design, with editing tools and layouts that most professionals are accustomed to. While Final Cut Pro and DaVinci Resolve offer a lot of the same functionalities, each program has a wildly different method in its utilization. DaVinci Resolve, meanwhile, has compatibility for macOS, Windows, and even Linux devices, offering the same functionality between all operating systems.

Final Cut isn’t available for any Microsoft Windows devices and probably never will be. The first thing to note is that Final Cut Pro is a macOS ONLY software. The age-old question remains though.which one is a better fit for your video editing needs? DaVinci Resolve vs.

It’s no wonder why so many people gravitate to both Final Cut Pro and DaVinci Resolve.

#Davinci resolve 17 free vs paid comparison professional

DaVinci Resolve has now become one of the most capable editing applications on the market for professional video creators and amateurs alike But, an unlikely video editing software has come out of the woodwork in the last few years, establishing itself as a heavy hitter in the industry.ĭaVinci Resolve started out as merely an advanced color grading application but was reworked after Blackmagic Design bought DaVinci Resolve back in 2009. It has made a name for itself as an amazing piece of video production software, up there with the likes of Adobe Premiere Pro and Avid.įor a while, these were the most common NLEs (non-linear editors) on the market. Apple’s Final Cut Pro has been an industry standard in the post-production industry for over twenty years now.